Quantcast
Home | Back

Kent mayor's race unresolved: Fiala leads Hawksley, but final count could take weeks

Share Story:     Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

 

By Mike Sever

Record-Courier staff writer

With just two votes separating them from the Kent mayor’s post, Jerry Fiala and Rick Hawksley apparently are headed for an automatic recount. 

But that could change depending on the outcome of provisional and absentee ballots still to be counted.

Fiala got 2,013 votes to 2,011 for Hawksley in Tuesday’s election, according to unofficial results from the Portage County Board of Elections. 

“We’re hanging in there. It’s just going to be a wait-and-see situation and we’ll react to whatever comes our way,” Fiala said Wednesday.

“When I filed my petitions I decided I was either the winner or the loser,” said Fiala, a former councilman and mayor who ran as an independent.

Hawksley, a two-term at-large councilman who was the Democratic nominee, said Election Day “was certainly one of the longest days of my life. Now it’s going to be the longest 20 days” until the board certifies final results.

The election night tally, the closest in a mayoral race in Kent’s history, includes absentee ballots and votes at the polls. 

But there are still some 500 absentee ballots outstanding that could arrive in the mail. And there are eight absentee ballots in Kent with incomplete information on their identification envelope. Voters have 13 days to come in and fill in the missing information.

The Portage County Board of Elections will certify the results on Nov. 24. Until then, both candidates are taking it easy.

Hawksley and Fiala each won 10 precincts. They tied with 14 votes each in Kent Precinct 4-A.

“It’s essentially a dead heat,” Hawksley said.

The win could depend on ballots that are still to be received in the mail.

Absentee ballots postmarked by Nov. 2 as well as those from military and civilian voters who live out of the U.S. will be accepted up to Nov. 13.

Also, there are 89 provisional ballots in Kent, not all of which may be counted if the elections board decides they are invalid.

Provisionals may be invalidated for a number of reasons — lacking proper identification, the ballot is not signed, or the person voted in the wrong precinct, for example.

If, after the board certifies results, there is still less than a half-of-one-percent difference in the vote totals, a recount will be done automatically.

If there is a wider difference in the final totals, candidates have five days to apply for a recount.

Both Fiala and Hawksley said that decision would depend on the final vote counts.  

If the parties decide to contest the election in court, a challenge must be filed with the local court within 15 days after the official results are certified or, if a recount is conducted, within 10 days after the official results of the recount are declared.

“The people at the board of elections are professionals so I guess we’ll just let them do their job,” Hawksley said.

Kent’s closest mayoral contest was in 1961 when a recount resulted in a tie between Mayor Redmond Greer, who had an 11-vote lead on election night, and his opponent, Robert Byrne. A coin toss broke the tie, giving Greer a second term.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2 3
   Next 10 Comments of 21 Total Comments
21.
    Posted by Kent Sheetz November 6, 2009
Fair Tax, the question was, who would you have voted for in a TWO MAN RACE between Fiala and Ferrara?

In a three man race like the one you described, a voter who likes candidate A, is neutral about candidate B, and dislikes candidate C might very well decide to vote for candidate B, if it increases the chances of defeating candidate C.

Remove candidate C from the race, and the same voter would most likely vote for candidate A.

I'm still waiting for an answer to the question, why was there no Republican candidate for mayor of Kent?

20.
    Posted by High Holy Grand Poo-Bah November 6, 2009
Fair Tax ,
Evidently the recall effort did not have very many bipartisan democrats, republicans and independents.

I didn't bring it up. You started it.

19.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 November 6, 2009
KS Can't you read? My post that you qoute below answers your question. Oh and the recall effort was bipartisan democrats, republicans and independents were involved in gathering petitions. So I guess you have no point to argue.

18.
    Posted by Kent Sheetz November 5, 2009
Fair Tax wrote:

"Honestly and hypothetically, if there was a three way race between Hawksley, Fiala and Ferara (only realistic Republican with a shot) I still would have voted for Fiala."

If the race had been between Fiala and Ferrara, how would you have voted?

17.
    Posted by Kent Sheetz November 5, 2009
It was interesting to read your points of view, but nobody answered my question why there no Republican candidate for mayor of Kent.

Have local Republicans determined that it better serves their interests to stage recalls of candidates they don't like than to put forward candidates they do like?

16.
    Posted by sugbear72 November 5, 2009
I have to concur with Fair Tax on this. I'm registered as a Democrat (you have to be in this area to even vote in primary season) but, like him, I have voted for a few Republicans. It's the best person for the job, regardless of party affiliation. I think this going to the provisionals and remaining absentee ballots doesn't bode well for Fiala, and that's a shame, he seemed like the best candidate for the office. I was voting for him anyway, but getting a phone call recording for a somewhat ceremonial position showed me that Hawksley doesn't seem to be that fiscally responsible.

My two cents worth, probably worth less than last year.

15.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 November 5, 2009
This has been a very good year for mushrooms,lol.

14.
    Posted by Ed1 November 5, 2009
The KEC will have mushrooms voting absentee for Hawksley. Good Luck Jerry but do you really think they will let you win. Remember in Kent it is not the voters that count it is the "Vision" and Hawksley has the "Vision". For the rest of us it is hallucinations and voices that he is hearing maybe some are from Bill Schultz.

13.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 November 5, 2009
KS Like I said we were satisfied with Fiala. If you look around Kent you will find that the city is overwhelmingly populated by Democrats.

That being said, there had to be a very large number of Democrats that voted for Fiala.

Your Democrat vs. Republican viewpoint just does not count in local politics.

Honestly and hypothetically, if there was a three way race between Hawksley, Fiala and Ferara (only realistic Republican with a shot) I still would have voted for Fiala.

12.
    Posted by Kent Sheetz November 5, 2009
You're avoiding the question. Why was there no Republican candidate for mayor of Kent?

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back